Emergency War Surgery NATO Handbook: Part IV: Regional Wounds and Injuries: Chapter
XXIX: Wounds of the Abdomen
Midabdomen
United States Department of Defense
Small Intestine
Simple perforations, lacerations, or tears of the small intestine should be minimally
debrided and closed primarily with a single layer of interrupted sutures (Figure 35).
Figure 35
The surgeon must carefully search for multiple injuries by examining the small
intestine in a systematic fashion, beginning at the ligament of Treitz and proceeding
distally, looking at 10" segments of bowel on one side and then the other. The entire
small bowel must be examined all the way to the cecum. The surgeon must carefully search
for injuries to the mesentery at the edge of the bowel, since small tangential bowel
perforations in the mesenteric surface may not be obvious on superficial examination. Use
the "rule of twos" in treating penetrating injuries of the intestine and colon.
Since fragments almost always perforate both walls of the intestine, they create an even
number of injuries to the gut. Therefore, an even number of perforations can be expected.
While this rule is not absolute, it is helpful in assuring that no injuries are missed.
Rather than several individual repairs, a limited resection encompassing multiple injuries
may be a safer and more expeditious approach in the patient with multiple injuries in
close proximity. Injuries of the mesenteric vessels should be dealt with by ligation and
bowel resection if there is nonviable or questionably viable bowel.
Injuries to the aorta and inferior vena cava are usually fatal. Those who survive to
reach the hospital frequently require urgent laparotomy as part of their resuscitation.
These patients will frequently deteriorate during resuscitation and transfusion. They must
be identified, explored, and hemostasis must be achieved, if they are to survive. An
occasional patient with a severe splenic or hepatic injury can present in a similar
fashion and require urgent operation for hemostasis. In this sort of case, continued
transfusion and resuscitation in order to make the patient a better operative risk do not
work, and death is the usual outcome. A senior surgeon must diligently search for these
patients in the preoperative area and ensure early surgical intervention for hemostasis.
The intraoperative management of these injuries includes generous incisions, the
obtaining of adequate proximal and distal control and then appropriate repair of the
injury. Frequently, minimal debridement and primary closure will suffice. Autogenous
tissue (vein graft) is better than synthetic material in the repair of the more extensive
vascular injuries, but suitable vein grafts may not always be available.
Helpful maneuvers to achieve hemostasis in these patients include the insertion of a
balloon catheter into the proximal and distal vessels through the injury site, use of a
sponge stick to compress the aorta against the spine at the level of the diaphragm, and
control of the aorta with a vascular clamp above the diaphragm via a limited thoracotomy.
Ureters
The ureters are infrequently injured. A ureteral injury usually causes hematuria. If
this is noted preoperatively, an intravenous pyelogram will often provide a more secure
diagnosis in these patients. Urine and blood will collect along the course of the ureter,
particularly if there was a penetrating injury. These collections should prompt the
surgeon to conduct a careful exploration of the entire course of the ureter.
Ureteral injuries can be repaired with fine absorbable sutures and closed-suction
drainage close to, but not touching, the repair. Internal stenting is not required in
simple injuries. In more extensive injuries with significant tissue loss, repair will
depend upon the location and extent of the injury and the experience of the surgeon. If
the lower third of the ureter is injured, it may be reimplanted into the dome of the
bladder through a muscular tunnel. The kidney can be mobilized, if necessary, to provide
some additional length. Repairs should be done transversely or on a bias to maintain the
diameter of the lumen since strictures may otherwise result. Drainage of all urinary
repairs is required. Closed suction is preferred.
Colon
Injuries to the colon frequently result from penetrating abdominal injuries. The basic
rule is that combat injuries of the colon ,hould not be closed. The majority of these
patients should have either a loop colostomy which includes the injury, or resection of
the injured colon and proximal diversion (Figure 36).
Figure 36
Major injuries of the right colon should be treated by right hemicolectomy, with
creation of a proximal ileostomy and distal mucus fistula (Figure
37). The reason for such a didactic approach is that these patients have an unprepared
colon, usually have associated injuries, and it is unlikely that the operating surgeon
will be able to follow the patient through the postoperative period. These particular
lessons have been learned and relearned at great expense in previous conflicts.
Figure 37
An option that is consistent with these guidelines is exteriorization of certain colon
repairs. Injuries to the transverse and sigmoid colon may be repaired and then
exteriorized in continuity for 6-10 days. If healing takes place, as is the case
approximately 50% of the time, the repaired colon can be replaced into the abdomen at a
second procedure. If the repair fails to heal, it can be converted to a loop colostomy
with no particular danger to the patient. If this method is chosen, the opening in the
abdominal wall must be large enough to allow for the stool to progress into the repaired
segment and back to the abdomen. This opening will be larger than that needed for the
usual loop colostomy. Failure to allow for this can result in the buildup of pressure in
the repaired segment that will cause failure of the repair.
Preoperative antibiotics are indicated when intestinal injuries are suspected; however,
their postoperative use beyond 12 hours is questionable. As in suspected injuries of the
small intestine, the surgeon must conduct a careful, methodical inspection of the colon
from one end to the other. Again, it is appropriate to emphasize that injuries on the
mesenteric surface of the colon are difficult to diagnose and must be searched for
diligently, particularly in the presence of hematoma.
Pelvis
Injuries of the pelvis can be particularly difficult and frustrating. Hemorrhage from
pelvic fractures or fragment injuries may not respond to the usual hemostatic techniques.
A major advance in treatment of fracture dislocations of the pelvis associated with
hemorrhage is the pelvic fixation device. This should be considered early in the
management of these patients. Injuries of the bladder and rectosigmoid are easily
overlooked. The surgeon must search for these carefully to avoid devastating
complications.
Rectum
The surgeon' must suspect a rectal injury in any patient who has suffered a penetrating
wound of the pelvis or in whom fragments could have traversed the pelvis. Anteroposterior
and lateral roentgenograms, interpreted with the knowledge of entrance and exit wounds,
are particularly helpful in determining if a rectal injury is likely to be present.
Digital examination of the rectum is required. Endoscopy to determine the presence of
intraluminal blood is indicated in these patients.
Blood in the rectum should be assumed to be evidence of a transmural injury. A search
for the specific location of the injury must be made. Rectal injuries are difficult to
diagnose at the time of laparotomy. If no injury can be found in a patient with frank
blood in the rectum, the surgeon must treat the patient as if a rectal injury has
occurred.
The treatment of patients with rectal injuries includes four components: first, a
proximal, totally diverting colostomy; second, thorough cleansing and irrigation of the
distal rectosigmoid; third, repair of the rectal tear, if accessible; and fourth, drainage
of the presacral space with soft drains of the closed-suction type (Figure 38).
Figure 38
Bladder
Injuries of the bladder are usually associated with hematuria, The surgeon should
suspect a bladder injury when the entrance or exit wound, the two-plane roentgenograms, or
hematuria suggest that this is the case. A cystogram is the definitive test. It is
obtained by the instillation of contrast into the bladder via an indwelling urethral
catheter. Two roentgen views should be taken, one with the bladder full and the other
after voiding. Extravasation indicates bladder perforation and requires operation.
These injuries should be repaired with two layers of absorbable sutures, insertion of
an indwelling suprapubic catheter, and placement of a soft closed-suction drain into the
region of the repair. Bladder injuries will heal if the edges of the wound are
approximated and adequate bladder decompression is maintained for ten days.
Reproductive Organs
Conservation should be practiced in the management of injuries of the reproductive
organs. Penetrating or crush injuries of the labia, penis, scrotum, and testicles are best
treated by conservative debridement and primary repair, if practical. The scrotum should
be drained with a soft rubber drain. Injuries to the uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes
will require conservative debridement and repair. Drainage is seldom indicated.
Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited.
The listing of any non-Federal product in this CD is not an
endorsement of the product itself, but simply an acknowledgement of the source.
Operational Medicine 2001
Health Care in Military Settings
Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Department of the Navy
2300 E Street NW
Washington, D.C
20372-5300 |
Operational Medicine
Health Care in Military Settings
CAPT Michael John Hughey, MC, USNR
NAVMED P-5139
January 1, 2001 |
United States Special Operations Command
7701 Tampa Point Blvd.
MacDill AFB, Florida
33621-5323 |
This web version is provided by
The Brookside Associates Medical Education Division.
It contains original contents from the official US Navy NAVMED P-5139, but has
been reformatted for web access and includes advertising and links that were not
present in the original version. This web version has not been approved by the
Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense. The presence of any
advertising on these pages does not constitute an endorsement of that product or
service by either the US Department of Defense or the Brookside Associates. The
Brookside Associates is a private organization, not affiliated with the United
States Department of Defense.
Contact Us · ·
Other Brookside
Products
|