Medical Education Division
Our Products
On-Line Store

Google
 
Web www.brooksidepress.org

Operational Medicine 2001
Emergency War Surgery
Second United States Revision of The Emergency War Surgery NATO Handbook
United States Department of Defense

Home  ·  Military Medicine  ·  Sick Call  ·  Basic Exams  ·  Medical Procedures  ·  Lab and X-ray  ·  The Pharmacy  ·  The Library  ·  Equipment  ·  Patient Transport  ·  Medical Force Protection  ·  Operational Safety  ·  Operational Settings  ·  Special Operations  ·  Humanitarian Missions  ·  Instructions/Orders  ·  Other Agencies  ·  Video Gallery  ·  Phone Consultation  ·  Forms  ·  Web Links  ·  Acknowledgements  ·  Help  ·  Feedback

 
 

Emergency War Surgery NATO Handbook: Part III: General Considerations of Wound Management: Chapter XVIII: Vascular Injuries

Choice of Conduit

United States Department of Defense


When major arteries or veins require patching or replacement, the surgeon must decide which patch material or conduit to utilize Conventional wisdom is that the greater saphenous vein is the material of choice It should be harvested from the uninjured extremity whenever possible to avoid compromising venous outflow from the injured extremity and wound healing problems should an arterial repair fail and result in marginal ischemia. When the greater saphenous vein is not available, the lesser saphenous vein is the next best choice, as its histology is similar to that of the greater saphenous vein. Upper extremity veins are another available source of patch material or conduit, but have thinner walls and are thus more prone to degeneration and aneurysm formation. Neck veins should not be used because they are too thin walled to withstand arterial pressure In the trauma setting, autogenous arteries and synthetic conduits should be used only under extreme circumstances, when no other vascular substitute is available. Synthetic conduits of all types are prone to infection. In the rare event that a synthetic conduit is needed, poly-tetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is preferable to Dacron, as it appears to have a better chance of resisting and withstanding infection.

 

 


Approved for public release; Distribution is unlimited.

The listing of any non-Federal product in this CD is not an endorsement of the product itself, but simply an acknowledgement of the source. 

Operational Medicine 2001

Health Care in Military Settings

Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
Department of the Navy
2300 E Street NW
Washington, D.C
20372-5300

Operational Medicine
 Health Care in Military Settings
CAPT Michael John Hughey, MC, USNR
NAVMED P-5139
  January 1, 2001

United States Special Operations Command
7701 Tampa Point Blvd.
MacDill AFB, Florida
33621-5323

This web version is provided by The Brookside Associates Medical Education Division.  It contains original contents from the official US Navy NAVMED P-5139, but has been reformatted for web access and includes advertising and links that were not present in the original version. This web version has not been approved by the Department of the Navy or the Department of Defense. The presence of any advertising on these pages does not constitute an endorsement of that product or service by either the US Department of Defense or the Brookside Associates. The Brookside Associates is a private organization, not affiliated with the United States Department of Defense.

Contact Us  ·  ·  Other Brookside Products

 

 

Advertise on this site